JOURNAL ENTRY 2 JOURNAL ENTRY 2 Submit a journal entry (along with your time log). The journal entry is your opportunity to be

  

JOURNAL ENTRY 2

JOURNAL ENTRY 2

Submit a journal entry (along with your time log). The journal entry is your opportunity to be self-reflective and needs to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. See the Practicum Guidelines located in the 
Practicum area, and this week’s Learning Resources, for a complete description of the practicum.

Submit your Assignment 
by Day 7 of Week 7.

 

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES


Required Readings

· Hickey, J. V., & Giardino, E. R. (Eds.). (2021). 
Evaluation of quality in health care for DNPs (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

· Chapter 8, “Planning a Program or Project Evaluation” (pp. 189–214)

· Chapter 13, “Evaluation of Populations and Population Health” (pp. 329–350)

· Sipes, C. (2024). 
Project management for the advanced practice nurse (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

· Chapter 3, “Design/Initiation: Project Management—Phase I” (pp. 55–84)

· Chapter 4, “Planning: Project Management—Phase 2” (pp. 85–130)

· White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2021). 
Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

· Chapter 9, “Project Management for Translation” (pp. 199–228)

· Aycock, D. M., Clark, P. C., Thomas-Seaton, L., Lee, S.-Y., & Moloney, M. (2017). 

Simple tools to facilitate project management of a nursing research projectLinks to an external site.

Western Journal of Nursing Research
39(3), 430–443.

· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). 


Develop SMART objectives—evaluate a CoPLinks to an external site.


Rubric

NURS_8502_Week7_Assignment1_Rubric

NURS_8502_Week7_Assignment1_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on the practicum experience hours completed.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response clearly reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the reflection.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely reflects on the practicum experience. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the reflection.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on the practicum experience, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete the Practicum Time Log.

40 to >0.0 pts

Excellent

A completed Practicum Time Log is submitted.

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Good

0 pts

Poor

An incomplete Practicum Time Log is submitted, or it is missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Create an outline for your comprehensive assessment of how your selected cultural group’s beliefs and practices might impact healthcare decision-making,

Create an outline for your comprehensive assessment of how your selected cultural group’s beliefs and practices might impact healthcare decision-making, treatment adherence, your communication, your interventions, and your education to align with the patient’s cultural values and preferences.  Submission Instructions: Download, rename, edit, and submit the outline template above. Complete

Professional Roles NU350 STEP (RNtoBSN) Program PEEP Assignment

Professional Roles NU350 STEP (RNtoBSN) Program PEEP Assignment Learning Objectives Review the Learning Objectives you developed for your PEEP Project specific to quality and safety initiatives in healthcare ( not the JSU Nursing Learning Outcomes). State the Quality/Safety problem you are addressing: Importance of annual wellness exams for women What

I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: ASSESSING THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM This course requires you to complete a series of case studies using the i-Human

I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: ASSESSING THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM This course requires you to complete a series of case studies using the i-Human Patients software application. The i-Human Patients (IHP) Case Player enables you to interact with virtual patients for the purpose of learning patient-assessment and diagnostic-reasoning skills. With IHP, you

Go to Module 4 Assignment: Cultural Assessment for detailed instructions. Create an outline for your comprehensive assessment of how your selected

Go to Module 4 Assignment: Cultural Assessment for detailed instructions. Create an outline for your comprehensive assessment of how your selected cultural group’s beliefs and practices might impact healthcare decision-making, treatment adherence, your communication, your interventions, and your education to align with the patient’s cultural values and preferences.  Use Outline

20 American Nurse Today Volume 10, Number 11

20 American Nurse Today Volume 10, Number 11 www.AmericanNurseToday.com You can use the inventory below to help determine the health of your workplace. To complete it, carefully read the 20 statements below. Using a scale of 1 to 5, check the response that most accurately represents your perception of your

MCH TERMINOLOGY EDC/EDD Gravid

MCH TERMINOLOGY EDC/EDD Gravid Parity Striae Braxton Hicks Linea Nigra Chadwick’s sign Amenorrhea STI’S Hyperemesis Gravidarum Leopold’s maneuver Colostrum Quickening Lightening Doppler Fetoscope Amniocentesis Maternal Serum Alpha Fetal Protein(MSAFP) hCG LMP Menarche Nagle’s rule Fundal Height Bishop’s Score Freidman’s Curve Cervical dilatation Effacement Station Pap smear C/SECTION Progesterone Amniotic fluid