Review the case of Marshall v.Yale Podiatry Group (attached), and answer and complete the research from the ensuing questions.
1. What might have been the practical effect for the practice of podiatry if the decision in Marshall had been the opposite?
2. Do you believe it is fair to allied health professionals that they be judged by the standards of physicians? Be sure to answer the question from all stakeholder perspectives. 3. Might the evolving practice of assigning grades or scores based on outcomes be a reasonable alternative here if the goal is inform and empower consumers to make informed choices? Include supporting evidence from 3 to 5 evidence-based peer-reviewed articles published in journals. Web sites, newspapers and editorials are not considered evidence-based sources.
#Review #case #Marshall #v.Yale #Podiatry #Group
